Skip to content
TheTeaReport

Fictional product walkthrough

Read the report before you run one.

This illustrative report shows how identity signals, registry checks, public-record context, and open-web findings are organized—with confidence labels and source notes beside the information they qualify.

Before the example

How to read confidence

A label estimates whether a source item belongs to the selected person. It does not rate the person or the seriousness of an item.

Confirmed
Several reliable signals align on the person, such as name, age, and location. It describes match confidence—not a guarantee that every source is error-free.
Likely
A strong source and supporting details point to the same person, but one or more useful identifiers are unavailable.
Possible
Only limited details align, or an important detail conflicts. Treat the item as a lead to verify—not as a fact about the person.

Illustrative report · not a real person

Example Subject A

Submitted signals: invented full name, age range 30–39, and Portland, Oregon. No contact information is displayed in this public example.

Generated
Illustrative
Coverage
United States

01

Identity signals

Profile
Example Subject A Confirmed
Age range
30–39 Confirmed
Location
Portland area Likely
Alternate profile
Similar name, different state Possible

Source note

The alternate profile is kept separate because its location conflicts with the submitted signal. A similar name alone is not enough to attribute it to this profile.

02

Registry check

Not found in checked registry sources

No published US sex-offender registry result matched the example name, age range, and location at the illustrative check time.

Source note

“Not found” means no matching result was returned by the sources checked. It does not prove that no record exists, that every jurisdiction is complete, or that a person is safe.

03

Public records and court signals

No court signal attributed to the example profile

A similar-name record without enough matching identifiers would remain an unattributed lead. The report may surface criminal, civil court, lawsuit, or property-record signals when available, but it should not merge a record into a profile based on a name alone.

Source note

Court availability, identifiers, indexing, and update timing vary by jurisdiction. Sealed, expunged, delayed, or non-digitized records may not be available.

04

Public web

Professional page
Matching city and career details Likely
Public social profile
Similar display name only Possible
Public mentions
Not found in checked sources

Source note

Open-web results can change, disappear, or describe someone else with a similar name. Source links and check dates help you review the underlying context yourself.

05

Source notes

What was checked

Candidate identity data, published US registry sources, available public-record and court signals, and credible open-web sources relevant to the selected profile.

What the labels mean

Confidence reflects the quality of the match between the selected person and a source item. It is not a judgment of character, risk, or safety.

What “not found” means

No matching published result appeared in the sources checked at that time. It is not proof that an event or record never existed.

How to use a report

Review source context and combine it with ordinary dating precautions and your own judgment. Never use it as a safety guarantee or for an FCRA-regulated decision.

Context, not certainty

A report can surface useful context. It cannot declare someone safe or tell you what to do.

Source coverage can be incomplete or outdated, and people can share names and biographical details. Review the evidence, notice uncertainty, and keep using practical dating-safety habits.